Treatment of bipolar II disorder
with lamotrigine
E. Vieta, J. M. Goikolea, A. Benabarre, C. Torrent, M. Comes, A. Martínez-Arán, M. Reinares,
F. Colom, G. Parramon, B. Corbella and C. Gastó
Bipolar Disorder Program. Center of the Stanley Medical Research Institute of Barcelona. Hospital Clínico. IDIBAPS. Barcelona
Tratamiento del trastorno bipolar II con lamotrigina
ORIGINALS
Summary
Introduction.
This study analyzes the effectiveness andsafety of lamotrigine in the treatment of bipolar II disorder.
Patients and methods.
S eventeen patients with DSM-IVbipolar II disorder with a history of poor response to lithium
or other mood-stab i l i ze rs gave their consent to be tre a t e d
with lamotri gine. Th ey we re fo l l owed-up for 6 months and
assessed with the Young Mania Scale (YMRS), Hamilton
D ep ression Rating Scale (HDRS-17) and the modified ve rs i o n
of the Global Clinic Impresion Scale for Bipolar Disord e r
( C G I - B P - M ) .
Results.
Twelve patients completed the study. Threepatients dropped out due to side effects (two because of mild
rash, which vanished after treatment was discontinued and
one because of vomiting) and two due to lack of efficacy.
The mean dose of lamotrigine for patients completing
the study was 202.1±64.4 mg/day. There was a significant
improvement in HDRS-17 scores (p =0.004) and the
depressive (p =0.002) and overall (p=0.002) subscales
of the CGI-BP-M.
Conclusions.
This study confirms previous findingsconcerning the antidepressant profile of lamotrigine
and its potential effectiveness in bipolar II disorder.
Key words:
Bipolar II disorder. Lamotrigine. Depression.Clinical trial.
INTRODUCTION
On the contra ry to the ge n e ralized opinion that type II
bipolar disorder is simply an attenuated or mild fo rm of
the classical maniac-depre s s i ve psychosis or type I bipolar
disord e r, seve ral studies have demonstrated that its
l o n gitudinal course is ch a ra c t e rized by a greater nu m b e r
of episodes
1, part i c u l a r ly depre s s i ve2, greater perc e n t ageof rapid cycl e rs
3 and of associated psych i a t ric disease4and greater risk of suicide
5. Consequently, the limitednumber of studies focusing on the treatment of this dis
o rder is surprising. A two year fo l l ow-up demonstra t e d
that appro p riate treatment can ra d i c a l ly ch a n ge the pro gn
o s i s
6, reducing the number of relapses signifi c a n t ly. Thekey would be the use of mood stab i l i z e rs and antidepre ss
i ves, avoiding the use of tri c y clics as mu ch as possibl e
7.Lamotrigine is a drug indicated in the treatment of
partial and generalized epilepsy in both adults and child
re n
8. Its fundamental action mechanism is that itblocks the sodium channels of the neuronal membrane,
reducing the release of excitatory amino acids such as
glutamate, although other mechanisms could also be
METHODOLOGY
A total of 17 patients who complied with the diagnostic
criteria of the DSM-IV for type II bipolar disorder
gave their consent to participate in the study. Mostly
(n=13) the response to lithium or to other anti-epileptic
agents had been unsatisfactory; in other cases, lamotrigine
was chosen due to contraindications to other drugs
or patient preference. The study design was open, observational,
and prospective over 6 months. Response to
treatment was evaluated by the Spanish version of the
Young Mania Scale (YMRS)
1 0, the Hamilton Depression RatingScale (HDRS)
1 1 and the m o d i fied ve rsion of the GlobalClinical I m p ression Scale for Bipolar Disorder (CGI-BP-M)
1 2.In each visit, appearance of adve rse effects and use of conco -
mitant medication were also evaluated. In every case,
lamotrigine was introduced in a stepwise way at a dose
i n c rease rhythm of 25 mg/week gi ven that it has been
d e m o n s t rated that this reduces the risk of the appeara n c e
of exanthema
8. The final dose was individualized foreach patient, considering efficacy and tolerability crite -
ria, and the dose of 200 mg/day as target dose based on
that observed in the controlled studies was maintained
as a re fe re n c e
1 3. D u ring treatment with lamotri gine, it wa sattempted to maintain the concomitant medication re c e ived
by the patients unch a n ged. An analysis for intention
to treat was perfo rmed with last observation carried
fo r wa rd analysis to stri c t ly compare the status of the patients
befo re and after the treatment. The statistical analysis
was perfo rmed with non-para m e t ric tests (Wi l c ox o n
RESULTS
The sample composition was made up of 17 bipolar II
patients with depressive symptoms and signs (n = 13),
hypomaniac (n = 2) or in partial remission (n = 2) who
demonstrated unsatisfactory response from any point of
view (inefficacy, intolerability, personal rejection) to
the conventional treatments. Concomitant treatment is
s h own in
t able 1. Mean age of the patients was 41.1± 10.7.There was a predominance of women (12.71%).
Twelve patients (71%) completed the 6 months of
follow-up. There were three drop outs due to secondary
effects (two due to exanthema, that disappeared when
the treatment was discontinued, and one due to vomiting)
and two due to lack of efficacy. The mean dose of
lamotrigine at 6 months was 160.3± 86.6 mg/day for all
the sample and 202.1±64.4 mg/day for the patients who
completed the study.
To evaluate the treatment efficacy, the scores of the
HDRS and YMRS scales with the subscales of the CGIBP-
M (mania, depression, and longitudinal course) were
compared between the baseline and final visit, carrying
forward the values of the patients who dropped out.
This analysis was also performed in the subgroup of patients
who initiated the treatment during a depressive
episode, these being the majority.
For all the sample, statistically significant differences
were obtained between the initial and final scores of the
HDRS scale (p = 0.004) and the subscales of the CGIBP-
M of depression (p = 0.002) and longitudinal course
(p = 0.002) as is shown in
figure 1. There were no differencesin the YMRS scale and the CGI-BP-M mania subscale.
Ten of the 13 patients who initiated the treatment
during a depressive phase showed improvements superior
to 50% of the baseline score in the HDRS scale,
which implies a 76.9 % percentage of responders. However,
since one of the responder patients really presented
a shift towards hypomania, with a score of 17
points in the YMRS, the real value of responders would
be 9/13, that is 69.2%. Applying the strict remission criterion
of presenting a score of 8 points or less on both
the YMRS and HDRS, there were 7 patients in remission
(41.2%) at the end of the follow-up, 6 of whom had initiated
the treatment during a depressive phase and 1
while euthymic.
Figure 2 shows these data.The adverse effects occurring during the study are
shown in
table 2. Ten patients (58.8%) showed someside effect, the most frequent being headache. Two
patients presented exanthema that was resolved without
complications when the treatment was discontinued.
Besides these two interruptions, a third patient discontinued
the medication due to intolerability related with
nausea and vomiting. One patient presented a shift towards
hypomania and was withdrawn from the study,
although this was considered as lack of response to
treatment. The shift, however, has been added to the table
as a possible side effect or as drug related.
CONCLUSIONS
The results of this study confirm the observation of
Calabrese et al. (1999a and 2000) that lamotrigine could
have antidepressive and mood stabilizer properties in
bipolar patients, although these studies specifically observe
an antidepressive effect in depressed bipolar I patients
and a preventive effect on the depressive phases
in bipolar II patients with rapid cycling, respectively.
Thus, our study provides data on the efficacy and safety
of lamotrigine in an indication that has still not been studied
strictly, although the results are clearly concordant
with those of the previous study.
However, there are important limitations that make it
necessary to be extremely cautious in the conclusions
that can be made from our study. The first and fundamental
one is the open and non-controlled design that
prevents intra-trial sensitivity from being known and
opens the door to a possible placebo effect. The second,
and no less important, one is simultaneity with other
treatments, which, although they were practically not
m o d i fied during the study, could contribute to the results.
The third obvious limitation is the sample size, with
more manifestation in patients who initiated the study
d u ring a hypomaniac phase or in partial remission. Finally,
compliance with the medication was not verified by any
laboratory technique, but rather was based on the information
provided by the patient and their family.
In spite of the limitations mentioned, we consider that
our study provides relevant information from the clinical
point of view. Although drug efficacy is shown much
better when compared with a placebo, the simple existence
of the placebo in the design of a study automatically
biases the study population, indirectly selecting the
patients with the most predisposition and generally,
the least serious. Controlled clinical trials also systematic
a l ly ex clude patients with a risk of suicide, with com o r b i d
disorders or polymedicated. In this sense, our study is
closer to the clinical reality and its results may possibly
be more generalized.
It seems that two conclusions regarding the efficacy
of lamotrigine in bipolar II patients can be deduced in
our study: lamotrigine seems to improve the depressive
symptoms of patients who initiated the treatment during
a depressive phase and the benefits of treatment seem to
extend beyond the acute phase with an improvement of
the disease course evaluated by the specific subscale
CGI-BP-M at 6 months. Our data are insufficient to draw
any conclusion in hypomaniac patients, given their limited
number. It can be deduced that the investigators were
more prone to enroll depressed patients than hypomaniacs,
probably as a consequence of the previous negative
data on the efficacy of lamotrigine in mania, that
have not been published, and the positive data in depression
9.One piece of data which, from our point of
view, instills certain optimism, is the finding of 41.2% of
the patients who are in remission at 6 months. Considering
that the patients enrolled were mostly resistant or
i n t o l e rant to the conventional treatment, this value seems
to be quite promising.
The mean dose of lamotri gine was 202 mg/day, in re l ationship
with the mean dose used in previous studies
3,13.Slow titration of 25 mg/week was performed in most of
the cases to avoid or reduce the risk of exanthematic
reactions as much as possible. After the titration period,
most of the patients took lamotrigine as a single morning
dose of 200 mg/day. The dose ra n ge used with 25 to 325 mg
if the patients who prematurely withdrew from the
study are included and from 100 to 325 if we refer exclusively
to those who reached 6 months of follow-up.
Lamotrigine was shown to be a well tolerated drug,
although three drop outs occurred due to side effects. In
two cases, interruption occurred due to the appearance
of a cutaneous exanthema that spontaneously abated at
48 hours of withdrawing the drug, and which, in both
cases, had limited seriousness. Although appearance of
exanthema has been described in approximately 10% of
the patients treated with lamotrigine (which coincides
with our study), this result of extreme seriousness rarely
occurs
8. The cases of serious exanthema are extremelyrare and have been related with high and sudden doses,
combinations with valproate, and more frequently in
children. In any case, in our study, we follow the guideline
of discontinuing treatment when any form of skin
reaction appears. Regarding other side effects, their incidence
was also comparable to that observed in samples
of epileptic
8 and bipolar3,13 patients. Another relevantquestion in the treatment of depressed bipolar patients
is the risk of hypomaniac change associated to the
t reatment. This risk has been associated with certain antidepressant
treatments
14, but it was not superior to thatof the placebo in the Calabrese et al. (1999) study. In our
sample, there was only one case (5.9%), which means a
value similar to that observed in the mentioned study,
which was 8% of the patients treated with 200 mg/day.
As a conclusion, we believe that, in spite of its limitations,
this study provides sufficient data on short and
long term efficacy of lamotrigine in bipolar II patients,
especially for those who initiate treatment during a depressive
phase. Up to the present date, few studies have
focused on analyzing the treatment of the bipolar II
disorder
15. If verified in randomized clinical trials, theresults of our study would indicate that lamotrigine is a
very interesting alternative in short and long term treatment
of bipolar II disorder. Other features that should be
studied are up to what point a combined treatment
(with lithium, for example) would be convenient and up
to what point the efficacy of lamotrigine in bipolar depression
extends to the prevention of the suicide behavior
as seems to occur in the case of lithium
16.REFERENCES
1. Vieta E, Gastó C, Otero A, Nieto E, Vallejo J. Differential
features between bipolar I and bipolar II disorder. Compr
Psychiatry 1997;38(2):98-
2. Ayuso-Gutiérrez JL, Ramos Brieva JA. The course of manicdepressive
illness. A comparative study of bipolar I and bipolar
II patients. J Af fect Disord 1982;4:9-14.
3. Calabrese JR, Suppes T, Bowden CL, Sachs GS, Swann AC,
McElroy SL, et al. A double-blind, placebo-controlled,
prophylaxis study of lamotrigine in rapid-cycling bipolar
disorder. Lamictal 614 study group. J Clin Psychiatry
2000;61(11):
4. Vieta E, Colom F, Martínez-Arán A, Benab a rre A, Reinares M,
Gastó C. Bipolar II disorder and comorbidity. Compr Psychiatry
2000;41(5):339-
5 . Rihmer Z, Rutz W, Pihlgren H. Depression and suicide
on Gotland. An intensive study. An intensive study of
all suicides before and after a depression-training programme
for general practitioners. J Affect Disord 1995;
35(4):147-52.
6 . Vieta E. Diagnosis and classification of psychiatric disorders.
En: Sussman N, editor. Anticonvulsivants in Psychiatry.
Worcester: Royal Society of Medicine Press Limited,
1999; p. 3-16.
7. Vieta E. Abordaje actual de los trastornos bipolares. Barcelona:
Masson, 1999b.
8. Messenheimer J, Mullens EL, Giorgi L, Young F. Safety review
of adult clinical trial experience with lamotrigine.
Drug Saf 1998;18(4):281-
9. C a l ab rese JR, Bowden CL, Sachs GS, Ascher JA, Monaghan E,
Rudd GD, for the Lamictal 602 Study Group. A doubleblind
placebo-controlled study of lamotrigine monotherapy
in outpatients with bipolar I depression. J Clin Psychiatry
1999a;60:79-
10. Colom F, Vieta E, Martínez-Arán A, García M, Reinares M,
To rrent C, et al. Ve rsión española de una escala de evaluación
de la manía: validez y fi abilidad de la escala de
Young. Med Clin 2002;119:366-
11. Hamilton M. A rating score for depression. J Neurol Neurosurg
Psychiatry 1960;23:56-62.
12. Vieta E, Torrent C, Martínez-Arán A, Colom F, Reinares M,
B e n ab a rre A, et al. Una escala sencilla de evaluación del curso
del tra s t o rno bipolar: la CGI-BP-M. Actas Esp Psiquiatr
2 0 0 2 ; 3 0 : 3 0 1 - 4 .
1 3 . C a l ab rese JR, Bowden CL, McElroy SL, Cookson J, Andersen J,
Ke ck PE Jr, et al. Spectrum of activity of lamotri gina in tre a tment-
refractory bipolar disorder. Am J Psychiatry 1999b;
156(7):1019-
14. Peet M. Induction of mania with selective serotonin reuptake
inhibitors and tricyclic antidepressants. Br J Psychiatry
1994;164(4):
15. Vieta E, Gastó C, Colom F, Reinares M, Martínez-Arán A,
Benabarre A, et al. Role of risperidone in bipolar II: an
open 6-month study. J Affect Disord 2001;67:213-
1 6 . Tondo L, Hennen J, Baldessasrini RJ. Lower suicide risk with
l o n g - t e rm lithium treatment in major affe c t i ve illness: a metaa
n a lysis. Acta Psychiatr Scand 2001;104(3):
Correspondence:
Eduard Vieta
Director Programa de Trastornos Bipolares
Departamento de Psiquiatría
Hospital Clínico de Barcelona
Villarroel, 170
08036 Barcelona (Spain)
E-mail: EVIETA@clinic.
Web: EBSCO
From: ratih ibrahim <personalgrowth@
To: psikologi_transform
Sent: Monday, November 5, 2007 11:55:39 AM
Subject: Re: [psikologi_transfor
Rekan rekan,
perkenalkan saya Ita, awam psikologi.
Apakah ada yang bisa memberi masukan mengenai Bipolar Tipe II?
Mengenai perkembangannya di Indonesia? Apakah penyakit ini hanya
bisa diselesaikan dengan obat antidepresan? Apakah konseling
psikologi tidak mampu banyak membantu? jika konseling membantu,
bagaimana meyakinkan seseorang yang meyakini dirinya mengidap
Bipolar II untuk berkonsultasi dengan psikolog di saat dia hanya
menginginkan antidepresan? Beliau menolak untuk diajak ke psikolog
namun untuk ke psikiater juga sulit. Terus menerus mengajukan
pertanyaan seputar antidepresan. Ajakan saya untuk bertemu psikolog
sepertinya berujung kekecewaan pada dirinya, merasa tidak di-
mengerti bahwa yang dideritanya adalah sakit dan hanya butuh obat.
Saya sangat memerlukan informasinya karena beberapa artikel tentang
bipolar II yang saya temukan hanya berbicara bahwa sakit ini seakan2
hanya butuh obat antidepresan dan dipergunakan rekan saya sebagai
semacam pembenarannya.
Terima kasih sebelumnya.
salam hangat,
Ita
Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch format to Traditional
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe
__,_._,___
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar